The troubled crypto exchange QuadrigCX has appealed for creditor protection, setting the stage for a significant court hearing on Feb. 5 in Canada.
Last Thursday, the exchange’s appeal was made before the Nova Scotia Supreme Court, with QuadrigaCX claiming that doesn’t have access to wallets containing some $137 million (U.S. dollars) in cryptocurrency. As such, it has claimed to be unable to repay more than 115,000 customers who are owed funds – and creditor protection is being sought to forestall any lawsuits while it attempts to find a solution.
To that end, QuadrigaCX is seeking to have professional services firm EY oversee its proceedings. Tuesday’s hearing, at 830 a.m. EST, will see the companies go before the court.
Christine Duhaime, a financial crimes attorney and managing partner with Duhaime Law, told CoinDesk that the most likely outcome during the hearing will be that a monitor – in this case, likely Ernst and Young – will be appointed.
Quadriga’s filing was not just for a monitor, however. Applying for creditor protection means it is trying to prevent customers from suing to recover lost funds, she noted.
“There are many unanswered questions though, for example, why have the wallet addresses not been disclosed? As you know in Bitcoin world, people know the pooled wallet addresses of exchanges – its not confidential or business information so that’s an unanswered question that a Court eventually will have to address. Someone is eventually going to bring an application for disclosure of all the wallet addresses.”
“Transparency is going to be critical for Quadriga and providing the wallets addresses is the first step to transparency,” she added.
The professional services firm EY has already submitted an initial report after discussing the situation with QuadrigaCX, according to a filing obtained by CoinDesk.
“The Proposed Monitor understands that Quadriga is experiencing a liquidity crisis and has been unable to satisfy withdrawal requests from users. Additionally, Quadriga has been unable to locate a significant amount of cryptocurrency following the death of the Applicants’ founder and Chief Executive Officer, Gerald Cotten,” the filing states.
The filing notes that the company has not yet been able to verify the details included in Quadriga’s initial filing, though it “has assumed the integrity and truthfulness of the information and explanations provided to it.”
In its report, EY explains that a number of factors resulted in Quadriga’s current issues, including its lack of a corporate bank account and Cotten’s death.
Most notably, EY has recommended that Quadriga maintain the suspension of its website. The exchange first took down its trading platform last week, after voting in new directors to run the company.
The firm has also recommended that Quadriga receive creditor protection under the Canadian Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act.
Doing so, it explains, will allow for a full investigation of the exchange and its business, which will determine what assets are available for distribution and what is actually owed to users (in its report, EY claims that Quadriga only owes funds to 92,000 users – far fewer than the exchange’s claim of 115,000 users).
If granted, Quadriga has a rough plan to operate through the next 13 weeks, or until April 28, the EY report says.
Duhaime noted that unless customers or shareholders have an opportunity to file affidavits or other submissions prior to the hearing opposing this protection, it is likely that Quadriga will receive the court’s approval.
Customers can appeal this decision, “and they can take action to protect their interests and seek the return of their funds” – but that would be dependent on the order issued Tuesday, she explained.
Duhaime did question why Quadriga filed for creditor protection in Nova Scotia, rather than British Columbia, where the companies affiliated with the exchange are registered.
“One of Quadriga’s new directors is resident in British Columbia. Quadriga’s only known former accountant and auditing firm is in British Columbia. One of the [companies] is cease traded in British Columbia which means that the British Columbia Securities Commission has jurisdiction over that company. Its corporate records are in British Columbia. Most of its shareholders are in British Columbia and a sophisticated transfer agent in British Columbia, is in charge of shareholder matters for that company,” she noted, adding:
“In my opinion, I cannot see a Nova Scotia judge, if he or she is apprised of all of the actual matrix regarding the connections to BC, concluding that a Nova Scotia Court has jurisdiction. It may happen that a Nova Scotia Court accepts jurisdiction but usually a Judge would ask the party to prove the jurisdiction issue, especially in this case where the applicant is seeking an order to prevent litigation so the rights of parties across the country are affected.”
The most important issue in the case revolves around the wallet…